People's Love for Toilet
Along with life and other properties, people of Sindhupalchok lost their toilets in the devastating Earthquake of April 2015. However, due to their habit of using toilet, they're doing whatever they could to revive their toilet.
The hygiene and sanitation status in the rural countryside is usually poor. After the massive campaign by UN Habitat through the support of Global Sanitation Fund, and local implementing partners--SEBAC Nepal and Janahit--the district was about to declare Open Defecation Free (ODF) on the last week of April 2015. However, the earthquake that appeared swept almost everything, including toilets. The repeated aftershocks that followed damaged the remaining toilets among other properties.
Despite the disaster, people are using their toilets by all means. The campaign has imprinted deep impression of sanitation behavior among people. Those villagers who used to go to the nearby forest, or crop field for defecation before, are now using their makeshift toilets. It is indeed a great leap forward.
After the disaster, people's endeavor to revive their toilet has a great variety. Some people are using available grass, tree branches or leaves for making temporary walls. Likewise, others are even using stone slates to plastic to make their toilet pan usable.
Moreover, some toilets are even riskier for people. Those toilet include the broken heavy stone wall of the toilet posing potential danger to the lives of those users.
The massive ODF campaign of UN Habitat together with Janahit has profound effect in building a habit of defecating in toilet among the people of Sindhupalchok. Now, even after the disaster, the urge to use the broken toilet is indicator of peoples' concern for using toilet.
A local NGO of Sindhupalchok, Janahit is now implementing Toilet Revival Campaign in Irkhu and Kubinde VDCs under UN Habitat's CERF project.
Gendering Water
Disrupting water source due to earthquake has made the situation even worse for women because fetching water has predominantly been the women's business in rural Nepal.
Among other household chores, bringing water is what women are responsible for in most households throughout the country. It is one of the daily task that is not considered economically important. The role of women is assigned to execute most of the in-house works has been exclusively given to women through ages.
After the devastating earthquake of 25th April 2015, the affected district Sindhupalchok, among others, is facing severe shortage of water. In fact, most of the water source have dried, some of them are relocated, but only few number of new ones have emerged. According to local people, the first quake of 25th disrupted water source; the second gave birth to several new sources; however, the third stronger aftershock dried most of them.
Due to the repeated aftershocks the risk of drying water source is larking.
Safeguarding water sources is key concern of the government and the civil societies. In addition, several international organizations are also working in WASH (Water Sanitation and Hygiene) in Sindhupalchowk. Currently, most notably, 26 INGOs are working in water supply rehabilitation. Among them Red Cross is trucking water; UNICEF, World Vision, Oxfam, Malteser International, Lutheran World Federation, CESI, HELVETAS, Mercy Corps,
Care Nepal are working to repairing water tanks, installing water pipes, rehabilitating water sources as well as distributing container pots. Most of them have either formulated new water users' committee or revived the old one. However, presence of women is not so much.
Due to the incessant efforts of the donors and the government body water availability is gradually improving. According to the update of WASH Cluster--the group of donors working in sanitation and hygiene in the district--several water supply schemes are being built, water sources are being revived, and access of water is being improved.
If the nature favors with less or no aftershocks the endeavor of all these organization is reaping its harvest. As a result, water supply schemes will be revived soon, and most of the households will be able to drink clean, safe and pure water.
However, the access of water to every households is not going to lessen the burden for women. Many water sources, if they got revived, are still far away from their homes. Next, many houses lack male members of the family. They are either in the other country, working as labor or migrated to the nearby town for employment and study. As a result, water fetching is being more skewed to women; and they're seemingly becoming responsible for it.
Earthquake in Sindhupalchok has suffered people much; however, women are more suffering due to lack of sufficient water. The effort of all the donors and government have improved the access of water, yet, women are the ones who carry water from the nearest accessible point to their homes.
The Making of God
Some people are really crazy. They've bizarre idea to show their love and devotion for somebody. They make temples of their loved ones, and make them God for worshiping.

Moreover, those elites are the ones who have created all those idols, Temples, Mosques and Churches. Since they make it, they're the authoritative agent to the powerful creature--the God. They're close to God, they say, so that they can rule over the rest of the masses.
In an instance, cadres of Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP) made a temple of PM Narendra Modi in Gujrat in an attempt to prove them to be greater lover and devotee of the powerful Indian man. Those cadres build the temple of Mr. Modi so that BJP can be religiously institutionalized, and their cadres can get a permanent hold in the society. But, this shrewd man denied the temple from being built, saying that it is against the Indian tradition.

However, majority of other notable Indian spiritual orators--who have declared themselves a God--are making their temples. It is not the first time a temple was made of a person in India. There are temples of Superstars Amitabh Bachchan, Rajanikant; and politician Sonia Gandhi. Moreover, there are many temples of modern day religious orators.
Moreover, some people need God not to tighten their grip in power, but to hold them calm. They need something to hold on, to calm down, to carry on or to believe in, so that they're occupied. Besides, they also want to show other about their affiliation with the powerful one which they worship. As a result they've created God out of their mind and started worshiping.
People make God to satisfy their own need. They create God either to show them strong, keep in top hierarchy in the society they live, make them closer to power, or keep them attached to something.
Does Neutrality Prevent Intervention ?
Non Alignment Movement was created during cold war to safeguard its members from the intervention of USA or Russia, but it has failed to do so.
The neutral status of Ukraine could not defend its sovereignty which forced it to join the western military pact—NATO. The Ukranian parliament voted to officially associate it with the stronger military force of the west, in a bid to save its sovereignty and territorial integrity from the invasion of stronger eastern neighbor.
The middle-of-the-road
position couldn't save Ukraine from the intervention of Russia. Non Alignment
Movement (NAM) which was created at the height of the cold war in 1961, to
counter the effect of western imperialism and Russian communism, is still
campaign with 120 member states on board. But the alliance of almost two third
of the world’s nations could not save Kiev from Kremlin’s unlawful
intervention.
Now, the question arises. Is neutrality a threat to
sovereignty, territorial integrity and peace of an independent nation?
Neutrality has fewer space in the current world order. The world is very much divided. When the world was divided into the aforementioned power blocs, some rich countries--Europeans and Baltic states were still their allies. Even after the fall of Russian empire, the world was almost unipolar with the US as the powerful polar star. However, the rise of China, India, Brazil and South Africa, and forming BRICS, including Russia, has made the world multi-polar. This signifies that countries are aligned towards their respective influential poles. Even the UN security council is deeply divided between cold war era power alliances, i.e. US (UK and France) and Russia (with China).
At this juncture, especially the LDC and LLDCs are more vulnerable to encroachment from the old as well as new power blocs. India has still turbulent border dispute with its neighbors, especially Nepal, where SSB of India is often said to move border pillars. In addition, China's presence in the South China Sea is hostile for Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Taiwan.
Especially, after Ukraine joined NATO, the neutral path of two thirds of the countries of the world is in limbo. It has neither protected them from encroachment of the powerful, and the new powers are constantly emerging. As a result, neutrality has become the connotation of surrender.
Neutrality has fewer space in the current world order. The world is very much divided. When the world was divided into the aforementioned power blocs, some rich countries--Europeans and Baltic states were still their allies. Even after the fall of Russian empire, the world was almost unipolar with the US as the powerful polar star. However, the rise of China, India, Brazil and South Africa, and forming BRICS, including Russia, has made the world multi-polar. This signifies that countries are aligned towards their respective influential poles. Even the UN security council is deeply divided between cold war era power alliances, i.e. US (UK and France) and Russia (with China).
At this juncture, especially the LDC and LLDCs are more vulnerable to encroachment from the old as well as new power blocs. India has still turbulent border dispute with its neighbors, especially Nepal, where SSB of India is often said to move border pillars. In addition, China's presence in the South China Sea is hostile for Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Taiwan.
Especially, after Ukraine joined NATO, the neutral path of two thirds of the countries of the world is in limbo. It has neither protected them from encroachment of the powerful, and the new powers are constantly emerging. As a result, neutrality has become the connotation of surrender.
Economics and the fall of nationalism
Economic insecurity and harsh taxation system have forced people to goodbye their citizenship.
The feeling of one’s attachment to the country of birth is gradually fading. Although the USA attracts immigrants globally, the citizen is already packing their bags for other countries leaving their citizenship and permanent residency. Whereas, thousands of immigrants are risking their lives entering Australia and Europe. The major reason behind, among others, is the economy.
The figure of Americans denouncing their passport has soared lately. Particularly, the new tax law, Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) is infuriating many expats. According to Federal Register, 776 US citizens bid their final goodbye to the US. Whereas, altogether 2,999, a 221% increase from the previous years of denouncement, was seen in 2013.
Similarly, a large number of Russians left their country in 2014 than before. Russia’s official statistics service, Rosstat, shows the exodus of 186,382 Russians in 2013 and 122,751 in 2012. Besides Putin’s policy of isolating Russia from the outside world, and the glimpse of severe recession due to western sanction made them to think about their future outside Russia.
Nearly half of China's business leaders with more than $16 million of wealth have investments overseas, according to the research firm, Bain Consulting. Now, China’s fortune of hundreds of billions of dollars, and waves of millionaires are flocking out of China to overseas. The wealthy are moving to protect their wealth, their health and their families. As well, with increasingly cracking down on ill-gotten gains and corruption, several politically connected rich are eyeing for safer shelters abroad.
The exodus of the citizen of the big economy to safe havens for securing their hard gotten wealth shows that economy greater role than nationalism. The era of utter nationalism where people were motivated to serve, live or even die for their birthplace is gradually shifting to economic domain. The globalization has further made the border permeable for those willing to migrate.
In a nutshell, if you want to retain your citizen, don’t impose more economic burden over them. Simple!
Consensus Blues of Nepali Politics
The ruling elites of Nepal who are invariably in the majority never
want consensus to hear the voices of weaker sections of the masses.
![]() |
Photo: DECCAN Chronicle |
When India PM Narendra Modi said,
‘Nepal should make a constitution on consensus taking confidence of dissident
parties rather than majority voting’ sparked a political debate in Nepal. Mr
Modi’s remarks in the course of his visit to Nepal during 18th SAARC summit in
Nepal has provoked some leaders of Nepali Congress and Communist Party of
Nepal, United Marxist and Leninist (CPNUML) who are pro-rightist. Whereas the
Maoist leaders are more assured of it, and thought to aid in their stance of
consensus for the constitution.
Mr Modi’s suggestion is taken as
intervention by pro-rightist leaders of Nepali Congress and CPNUML. Those
leaders, mostly belonging to the traditional ruling elite of Nepal, are not
convinced to address all the subdued voices of the weaker section of the
ethnically diverse Nepali society. Since they’ve been in majority throughout
the democratic history of Nepal, they’re less likely to accept the
representation and inclusion of all the people left behind. Whereas, Maoist
leaders who are regarded as pro-leftist and close to all the disadvantaged
people of Nepal are in favor of consensus in constitution building. Their
demand is to address the voice of the people belonging to the weaker section of
Nepali society who barely has a majority in the Constituent Assembly.
Leaders of NC and UML have
criticized Mr Modi’s remarks. Gagan Thapa, a young and popular leader of the NC
has said that Modi doesn’t have right to intervene in Nepali politics. In
addition, Mohan Bikram Singh, the leader of a fraction of CPNUML said that
Modi’s remarks over Nepal’s process of constitution making is intervention in
Nepal’s sovereignty. Both of them belong to the ruling elite of Nepal.
Nepal holds the story of
dominance by ruling elite in executive, judicial system and the legislature. Those
ruling elites are Bahun, Chhetri and Newar, or popularly known as people of the
mid-hill. After Janga Bahadur Rana, the powerful and cunning prime minister
promulgated the Civil Code 1910 based on caste hierarchy the people belonging
to lower echelon remained oppressed. His Civil Code is just a continuation of
Jaya Sthiti Malla’s division of Nepali society into four categories—Brahmana,
Chhetria, Vaishya and Sudra—based on the very Hindu philosophy of Vedic saint
Manu. Even after so called restoration of democracy in 1950 the same group got a
chance to exercise power. After two decades of democracy, then the King
Mahendra declared Nepal a Hindu state which further helped mid hill people to
prosper. As a result, they got a chance to gain education, collect property,
acquire most of the political and administrative positions and patronized their
cronies to rule the country. The situation remained same until the second
democracy in 1950.
The majority voting system was
further restored in 1950 after falling partyless Panchayat regime of the
monarch. Yet, the people of lower hierarchy remained away from exercising
democratic values in the country. It was until the third peoples’ revolution in
2006 which introduced inclusive democracy. A coalition government was made
based on consensus. Realizing the fact that the mere majority voting could not
represent all the people, the coalition government held the Constitution
Assembly election following first past the post and proportional representation
voting system. The interim government was formed from the Constituent Assembly,
which also drafted an interim constitution.
The interim constitution is a
short term arrangement for restoring peace and addressing the voice of the
people left behind by the mainstream development. Its mandate is to make a
constitution that can address the suffering of all the weaker section of Nepali
society who have never felt associated with the state. Thus, there was an
agreement of listening to the voice of all the people who normally do not have
representation (or enough representation) in government.
However, those ruling elites of
mid hill are not happy with listening to the voice of all those left behind. Although
consensus was the only mantra to write constitution first, then follow the
norms of constitutionalism i.e. rule of the majority, periodic election,
supremacy of the people, democracy, rule of law and judicial review.
Narendra Modi who is watching the
political advancement of Nepal closely, just uttered few words to reinstate
what Nepal has decided to go ahead with. Some leaders are simply commenting on
him to defend their greater share of several decades of power usage.
Reform way forward for New Nepal
The ride to the economy is not easy for the new government. For
years, Nepal's economy has long been entangled in its structural problems. The
economy is in ruins--as per some indicators, and a sign of improvement is looming.
Now, adoption of an appropriate fiscal
policy is the way forward. In order to
stabilize the macroeconomic balance, we have to promote a new round of reform. The
country is still pursuing dual economy. Owing to majority—more than 65
percent—of rural population, a single economic development strategy will not
reap the advantage. For crafting Nepal’s
economic reform, the political leadership should take a bold decision.
Before exploring Nepal’s new economic development
possibilities, it’s worth knowing the challenges.
Uneven development
Nepal has been facing the problem of imbalanced development
for decades. Since the fifth 5 year development plan the concept of regional
development emerged, thereby allocating budgets in equitable basis. However,
the distribution was never justifiable. Surprisingly, some influential
districts have been disbursed up to a quarter of the national budget, while
others were granted only an amount less than a hundredth. The situation worsened
after the political change in 2046 BS. Some influential—leaders, MPs and
bureaucrats, due to their higher echelon gave out more to their particular
districts. For example, in Morang and Sunsari districts, where most of the
Prime Minister, Finance, Home and other ministers belong to, have been given a
big chunk of the national budget. Likewise, top bureaucrats from National
Planning Commission, department of Irrigation, Physical Planning and the local development
division also used their power to draw budget into their home town or
districts.
The unequal distribution battered hard on other developing
regions. They barely received regular development budget. It affected more to
Karnali and Far Western districts. Beside the western hill areas, some
districts in the plains—Mahottari and Dhanusha also got to suffer by budget
crunch. As a result, these areas have human development index below the
national average. People in those areas could never feel the presence of the
state.
Highway Economy
The construction of East-West highway by the then King
Mahendra helped to foster economic activities around the areas; however, only
the eastern part of the country reaped benefits. High way helped to develop
small market towns around it, which has reached up to 125. Another road,
mid-hill highway has also laid foundation for most market towns and increased
trade and industry in those mountain patches.
In fact, the lifestyle change in the eastern part of the
highway is clearly visible whereas the western part still struggles to thrive. The
insufficient infrastructure and scattered settlement-- necessary for the growth
of economic activity is somewhat lacking in the west. For example, 1993 BS, Biratnagar-Sunsari has
been developed as an industrial area. Later, Birgunj and Bara-Parsa were
developed as Industrial Corridor. In contrary, poorly developing manufacturing
units in Butwal , Rupandehi , Banke - Kohalpur, Kailali are besieged for market
access long distance of transportation, that have severely obstructed the
economic activities.
So far, except in some binding conditions, the mid and far
western districts didn’t feel the presence of the state. After the people’s
movement, 2046 BS NGOs finally accessed to Karnali, identified injustice, and
started pouring some fringe support. Though, the NGO culture merely made them
more dependent.
Poor Industrial
Development
Although industrialization began quite late, in 1993 BS, the
progress is still infantile. During Rana Regime some Jute and match factory
were established. In Panchayat era, other countries--Russia, China, and India
supported to lay the foundation of the textile, sugar, cement, leather shoes, paper,
pharmaceutical and additional factories. However, approval of establishing
industries was very difficult because of the intervention of the palace. By
acquiring shares up to 51 percent, absolutely for free, the Palace used to
ascertain license to such industries. Therefore, no industry, including
multinationals, could thrive during the autocratic rule. Its contribution to
the GDP, once reached to 19 in 1995/96 has plunged to 15 percent as of now.
Moreover, more than a thousand of large and medium scale
industries were closed due to a decade long people’s war. In addition, around
twenty thousand of small and cottage industries also followed the similar fate.
Worsening
agricultural sector
Agriculture sector contributes 35 percent to Gross Domestic Product
(GDP) and 65 percent of employment is also degenerating. In the 1970's, Nepal
was exporter of agro products, contributing up to 40 percent of GDP. However,
total production of food in the country is not sufficient to feed us. Therefore,
we are importing hefty sum of grain and vegetable to suffice our need. Due to
low production and productivity, agriculture is being abandoned. The production
cost exceeds farther than the cost of the same imported goods.
High unemployment
Unemployment is towering because of the lesser opportunity
in both the agriculture and industry sector due to their sluggish progress. For
example, one in eight youths entering the job market every year gets a job. The
only door open for them is to pack their bags, cue on the line, and go for foreign
employment. Currently, the rate of out-migration
of 18-40 years of youth is more than 65 percent. The fleeing of working age
population abroad is a great risk for the growing economy.
Lack of good
governance and opacity
From the good governance perspective, Nepal is in dismal
condition, as the corruption index says. Lack of good governance has
contributed to deterrence in the economic development. Lack of good governance
and opacity is regarded as the main cause of Nepal’s underdevelopment. It increases the cost of development projects,
and reduces spending. Donors also question on the expenditure thereby reducing
their aid and investment. This is a great setback for countries like Nepal who
depends heavily on foreign aid.
High trade deficit
Nepal is hit hard at present by a massive trade deficit of nearly
5 billion Rupees. The total income of
over a year is merely sufficient in importing petroleum. Substituting import
has become just a daydream. At this juncture, there is a dire need to think
about a policy—if implement—can substitute imports and increase exports.
If we have to drive the economy towards sustainability and
stability, there is an immediate need of the second round of reform. And it
should address all those aforementioned challenges.
Religious Tourism: Are we doing enough?
The diverse cultural
wealth of Nepal provides huge potential for religious tourism. Motivating
domestic visitors and attracting pilgrims from neighboring countries is of
great importance.
Nepal’s rich cultural heritage offers an ample possibility
for religious tourism. The population—enriched with several castes, ethnicity
and nationality is a portrait of a great cultural legacy. The variety of societies
is a great cultural wealth in itself. The harmony among culture is a pride. However,
has Nepal ever been able to harvest the benefits from its rich cultural
diversity? Is there any mechanism where we can sell our rich family tradition?
Or have we ever harvested substantial gain from religious tourism?
So far, Nepal’s religious tourism has always been dependent
on luck. As the religion is dependent on faith, the path of its development has
remained reliant on destiny. As a resolution, religious tourism in Nepal is
following a stunted growth.
Approximately 300 to 330 million pilgrims visit the world's
key religious sites every year, reports the World Tourism Organization. Likewise,
Americans traveling overseas for "religious or pilgrimage" purposes
has increased from 491,000 travelers in 2002 to 633,000 travelers in 2005 (30%
growth), estimates the U.S. Office of Travel and Tourism Industries. This image
indicates that religious tourists are getting.
However, religious tourism is one among the most promising
sector in Nepal. In fact, Nepal harbors fertile ground for flourishing two of
the world’s eminent religion—Hinduism and Buddhism. The country slotted between
India and China shares a piece of the larger history of ancient civilizations
blossoming in the area. Consequently, this tiny southern Asian state offers
holy land for the Buddhists of the world. In addition, similarity in history,
culture and geography with the vast populace of the south of Himalayas-- across
the Ganges plains-- allures millions of Hindu pilgrims of India. Moreover, the
country with abundant temples, monasteries and shrines are of outstanding
importance for the predominant number of fans in Nepal and abroad.
Nepal is garnered with rich cultural diversity and
harmonious religious co-existence among Hindu, Buddhist, Christian, Muslim,
Bon, Kirat, Jain and Sikh. For the Hindus, there is one among the
holiest--Pashupatinath Temple situated in Kathmandu. Devghat in Tanau district
is also a famous spot for Hindus. Likewise, Lumbini, the birthplace of Lord
Buddha is one of the most revered places for Buddhists in the world, is sited
in Rupandehi district. In addition, there are monasteries and caves where Guru
Rinpoche meditated. Up in the Himalaya of Mustang district Lord Vishnu is
believed to reside in the temple of Muktinath. The district also contains Bonpo
shrines. The holy lake of Gosainkunda near the mountain top is devoted to Lord
Shiva.
A routine of religious and ethnic festivals are enjoyed in
these pilgrimage sites. The large number of devotees, both Nepalese and Indians,
visit Pashupatinath temple during Shivaratri. They also celebrate Maghe
Sankranti in Devghat and Kumbhamela in Chatara, Sunsari.
Several honored religious leaders, priests, saints, monks
and Maulanas have been inhabited these places. They have been preserving
cultures; motivating people for visiting the place, and inspiring devotees for
of pilgrimage.
However, the epic significance of the religious sites and
the perpetual efforts of those religious figures are still insufficient. As a result,
Nepal has not been able to showcase its religious hotspot to the prospective
customers—pilgrims and tourists—in the region.
For example, in India, religious tourism has been given an
utmost priority. Religious figures, government, private sector and media are
playing a significant role in promotion. Most of the locations of mythological
significance are already enlisted in scriptures. For example, Gaya, Kashi,
Puri, Badrinath dham, Kedarnath dham, Haridwar, Dwaraka etc have already
collected hoards of publicity in religious teachings. Next, their media and
film also played a significant role in promoting religious tourism. Some
Bollywood movies portrays religious sites. The television channels also
encourage their viewers to believe in their respective believes and promote
religious tourism eventually. Furthermore, celebrated religious persons—there
are many in India—play an important prominent role for influencing people for
pilgrimage. As a result, countless people flock to India annually in their voyage
for religion.
Moreover, people of Mecca, the Muslim holy place, do not
need agriculture because the God has given them the pilgrimage as their yearly
crop. Millions of Muslims go to the Islam’s holiest site, Saudi Arabia to take
part in the year’s haj. The annual haj ceremony brings approximately 16.5
billion dollar—3% of GDP to Saudi Arabia. Next, Jerusalem, a holy metropolitan
for all three Abrahamic religions, also draws large number of pilgrims.
Likewise, huge number of Shia Muslims visit shrines in Iraq.
Despite having Buddhists’ holy site—Lumbini in Nepal, an
adequate mechanism is still lacking. World’s second largest economy—China is
just at the northern border. Although Buddhist population is rapidly being
converted to Christianity in China, the remaining number of Buddhist in the
country are still higher than any countries in the world. If Nepal can attract
them, it would be enough for sure.
There is a need to attract religious tourists/devotees by
promoting pilgrimages through religious personalities, government agencies,
private sector and media. Definitely, media has a profound effect—proved by
many researches—on customer’s motivation. A regular discussion on pilgrimage
sites in media with eminent spiritual personalities has a profound effect on
potential visitors. It helps local devotees/pilgrims to explore native
religious places of divine reputation rather going India or China because
travelling to other countries has become riskier for Nepalese pilgrims.
In a nutshell, we have to promote our religiously valued
holy sites to our citizen first, that will save a huge sum of money from going
abroad. Besides visiting Indian cities or Manasarovar of China for religious
tour, we have to explore our historically important places. Next, the strategic
location of Nepal between two great Asian cultures—India and China gives us a
great opportunity to earn, develop and prosper. This can also be possible
through religious tourism. Also, attracting the prospective tourists of the
Indian Sub-continent to visit the Nepalese pilgrimage destinations is a big
battle to be won.
TBT Agreement Promotes Production of Quality Goods for Export
Implementation
of Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) not only promotes producing quality goods but
also restricts import of cheap and low quality goods that are harmful for
people and the national economy.
Nepal’s membership
of the WTO in April 2004 has harnessed
its integration into the international economy. It has aimed to establish an
enabling environment for the private sector thus fostering improvement in
competitiveness. Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)--an agreement within
the framework of the WTO—assures the quality production of goods for export
that helps to promote Nepal’s international trade.
What is Technical Barriers to Trade?
Technical Barriers
to Trade is a protective measure applied by the government to protect its
domestic producers from foreign influx of goods. The Government of Nepal (GoN)
applies domestic regulatory process that allows limited entry of products from
other countries. In addition, TBT is Non-tariff Barriers and measures (NTBs)
other than border tariffs affecting trade in goods, services and factors of
production. TBT is rule for product weight, size, packaging, ingredient or
identity standards, mandatory labeling, shelf-life restrictions, and import
testing and certification procedures.
The aim of the
TBT Agreement is to insure that technical regulations, standards and conformity
assessment procedures, do not create unnecessary obstacles to international
trade. In addition, the agreement allows adequate regulatory discretion, to
protect human, animal and plant life and health, national security, the environment,
consumers, and other policy interests of the member countries.
The TBT Agreement establishes rules and
disciplines designed to prevent mandatory technical regulations, voluntary
standards, and conformity assessment procedures from becoming unnecessary
barriers to international trade. Nevertheless, the TBT Agreement seeks to allow
members with sufficient domestic policy autonomy to pursue legitimate
regulatory objectives.
How did Nepal sign the Agreement on
Technical Barriers to Trade?
Agreement on TBT is one of the agreements within
the World Trade Organization. The WTO was created with the aim of removing any
form of barriers (both tariffs and non-tariffs) for international trade. Therefore,
TBT, as one of its agreements, serves the function of taking out those product
quality barriers.
The WTO Agreement on T BT entered into
force in 1995 which was the conclusion of the Tokyo Round of Trade Negotiation
in 1979. During the accession process to
the WTO, Nepal agreed with the checklist of the Working Party in April 2000. In
addition to Trade in Goods, Trade in Services and Intellectual Property Rights,
TBT agreement is one of the mandatory obligations of the WTO. Therefore, Nepal
adopted the principle of the Agreement on TBT as one of the ingredients of the
WTO accession package on 23rd April 2004.
What is the mechanism for monitoring
Technical Barriers to Trade in Nepal?
The government of Nepal has designated Nepal
Bureau of Standards and Metrology (NBSM) as a national enquiry point. Since its
establishment, the section has been notifying and publishing various
information regarding TBT that include; national and international notice of
standards, technical regulation and conformity assessment procedures and other
concerned information. Presently, in that respect are three technical officers
specially assigned to regulate this part.
What are the benefits of the TBT Agreement
for Nepal?
The Agreement on TBT offers Nepal
with sufficient rights to restrict low quality products from being imported.
The standards and technical regulations set at the world class levels protect
domestic consumers. In addition, it also avoids unnecessary barriers to
imported goods that will benefit the national economy.
Side by side, the agreement
promotes national exporters to meet international criteria that boost them to
produce quality goods for export.
Further, it also protects exporters
against unnecessary TBT-related barriers in foreign markets.
What are the hurdles in implementing the
Agreement in TBT?
We have not been able to utilize
the benefit of the TBT Agreement because of our weak technological development.
The lack of sufficient infrastructure at the border has allowed low quality
products in the domestic market. In addition, the private sector has a lack of
sufficient understanding of TBT provisions and has not brought these issues to
the notice of the government. As a result, we have not been able to export
quality products to the foreign markets and low quality products are easily
entering domestic market.
Are there any technical assistance to
improve technical standards, credibility and conformity assessment in Nepal?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) including Nepal are
liable to receive technical assistance from rich WTO member countries. Wealthy
countries provide advice and technical assistance and they shall give priority
to the needs of the least-developed country members.
Nepal has received technical assistance from the European
Union to enhance its TBT and Sanitary and Phyto Sanitary (SPS) related
capacity. The International Trade Centre (ITC) has also supported identify
non-tariff barriers for some products in the context of Nepal’s Trade
Integration Strategy.
What is the future strategy of Nepal to get
maximum benefit from the Agreement on TBT?
The Government of Nepal has launched NTIS
2010 as one of its trade strategy for consecutive five years. One of the
objectives of NTIS 2010 focuses to strengthen capacity of GoN to coordinate and
manage Trade Related Technical Assistance (TRTA) and Aid for Trade (AfT).
The Ministry of Commerce and Supplies
(MoCS) has already secured funding from WTO under the Enhanced Integrated Framework
(EIF) to manage TRTA and AfT to enhance TBT related capacities of the
government. In addition, the government has planned to enhance monitoring TBT
commitments under the support of Tier 1 funding mechanism of the EIF.
Implementing Development Projects in Nepal
A development partner
has to address Nepal’s heterogeneous society, tactful private sector and
hierarchical civil service structure to successfully implement any projects.
I have gone through variety of experience while implementing
developing project at local, regional, central government level, as well as
with private sector in Nepal. The special structure of Nepali society,
political culture, civil service and the growing bureaucracy within it hold
some implications for materializing any missions under foreign aid.
As per my involvement in some projects under the German
Development Cooperation (GIZ) I came to know that some projects achieved
success while another remained their goal unattained within the given time.
Although the tasks I was involved with became successful, a
huge effort was required to bear out the actions.
I met frequently people from local government—District Development
Committee, Village Development Committee and Government Line Agencies--during implementing
‘Inclusive Development of the Economy Program (INCLUDE). The project was
targeted at enhancing economic status of the poor and increasing their access
to finance. I was monitoring and evaluation officer always tightening belts of
my colleagues for acquiring project related information. At the district level,
it became really easy to come in contact with the targeted local people. The
local government authorities have good rapport with Civil Society Organizations
(CSOs), Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) Farmers’ Groups (FGs), Trade
Unions, and private beneficiaries.
There is always a chance of captivating benefit by few
people in the rural areas. Some local elites, few educated ones and sometimes
party cadres are mostly chosen for information gathering. I too arrived to
select few of them as there was no other choice given. They were the lone
knower of all the developmental activities in the region. In summation, they
attend most of the trainings and know information about the local socioeconomic
status. As a consequence, most development workers choose them. I was not an
exception either.
Next, I worked with local CSOs, NGOs and FGs while
implementing Capacity Building for BioTrade Project (CBBT). The project was
jointly implemented by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
and GIZ in Peru, Namibia and Nepal. GIZ supported private sectors including
CSOs producing essential oil in Nepal. While working with CSOs and NGOs, I came
to recognize that they’re really adept at mobilizing local people. Government
line agencies have good relation with those CSOs and NGOs which is an asset.

In due course, I acted with most of the development partners
and high level government officials of the ministries of Nepal during executing
Supporting Nepal’s Implementation of its WTO Commitments and the Enhanced
Integrated Framework (WTO/EIF-SP) project. The strategy was directed at
improving export trade by capacitating GoN to implement its WTO commitment. Another
component was effecting Nepal Trade Integration Strategy (NTIS 2010). By mobilizing
Aid for Trade (AfT), and Trade Related Technical Assistance (TRTA) through
multilateral funding of the WTO under the Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF),
the project demanded harnessing the effort of all the related ministries and
development partners of Nepal.
So far, the project remained successful. It achieved its
goal on time by drafting all the laws, conventions and policies. I worked hard
to design a monitoring mechanism for the Government of Nepal (GoN) to monitor
the implementation of its WTO commitments. Yet, I still doubt its furtherance. Although,
together with my team, I constructed a robust mechanism and handed over it to
the ministry.

Also, frequent transfer of the personnel often posed hurdles
for project execution. The transferal triggered another teething troubles, such
as, fading institutional memory. Recurrently, I encountered different faces on
the same chair. That demanded repeated orientation efforts. In addition, feeble
IT infrastructure in some of the ministries hindered regular communication with
the GoN staffs. In fact, the nature of bureaucracy is accustomed of restricting
the flow of information towards below. This is the area to be taken charge of.
The atypical characteristic of Nepali society and public
service needs special attention while implementing development projects in
Nepal. Coming up to the aforementioned issue paves way for the success of any
development charges.
Nepal in Figures
World
Development Indicators 2014 delivers a compilation of pertinent,
first-class, and globally comparable statistics on development and poverty. The
indicators are synthesized under six themes--world view, people, environment,
economy, states and markets, and global links. Other sections comprises stories
highlighting particular global, regional or country trends. The report portrays
progress of every countries including Nepal against the backdrop of development
indicators. The report compiles statistics from more than 200 countries through
a concerted effort of partners including the United Nations, the Organization
for Economic Co-operation and Development, the International Monetary Fund, and
the International Telecommunication Union.
Global poverty is reducing at faster rate. Nepal belongs to South Asia where half of the world's poor live. Growth is faster in this Asian region. As of 2012 Nepal has GDP US $ 18.96 Billion which is lowest in South Asia. However, it is on a constant rise. It means, despite all the odds, wealth is increasing in Nepal.
Over the years, per capita income is also increasing; however, not in a way as expected. Although GNI per capita is low in South Asian region, it is little bit higher than that of other low income countries. Per capita income reached to US $ 700 in 2012.
Foreign investment is crucial for Nepal's development. In fact, the low balance of payment and small reserve of foreign currency has left Nepal to seek support from foreign investors. Besides international Assistance (Aid) foreign investment is playing a crucial role for creating wealth in Nepal. So far, foreign investment was almost US $ 91 million in 2012 which was slightly less than in 2011. The following year has brought more FDI in the country.
Global poverty is reducing at faster rate. Nepal belongs to South Asia where half of the world's poor live. Growth is faster in this Asian region. As of 2012 Nepal has GDP US $ 18.96 Billion which is lowest in South Asia. However, it is on a constant rise. It means, despite all the odds, wealth is increasing in Nepal.
Over the years, per capita income is also increasing; however, not in a way as expected. Although GNI per capita is low in South Asian region, it is little bit higher than that of other low income countries. Per capita income reached to US $ 700 in 2012.
Foreign investment is crucial for Nepal's development. In fact, the low balance of payment and small reserve of foreign currency has left Nepal to seek support from foreign investors. Besides international Assistance (Aid) foreign investment is playing a crucial role for creating wealth in Nepal. So far, foreign investment was almost US $ 91 million in 2012 which was slightly less than in 2011. The following year has brought more FDI in the country.
Education sector has seen a remarkable progress. School enrollment in primary level was increased by 135% in 2013. This is almost close to attaining Millennium Development Goals.
The economic transaction of the country remained turbulent lately. It declined to almost nothing in 2010. Though, the remittance and tourism helped the economy make better saving that soared Balance of Payment (BoP).
Data from World Bank
Betterment in aforementioned indicators is one of the good news for Nepal's economy. After a long duration of stalemate, something is good is slowly happening.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Featured Post
An Evening in Patan
Despite being badly battered by the devastating earthquake, the Patan Durbar Square, one of the World Heritage Sites of Nepal, is slowly ri...

Archive
-
▼
2018
(8)
- ► April 2018 (1)
- ► March 2018 (3)
- ► February 2018 (3)
-
►
2017
(2)
- ► March 2017 (1)
- ► January 2017 (1)
-
►
2016
(6)
- ► April 2016 (2)
- ► January 2016 (3)
-
►
2015
(8)
- ► October 2015 (1)
- ► September 2015 (1)
- ► August 2015 (2)
- ► March 2015 (1)
- ► February 2015 (1)
- ► January 2015 (2)
-
►
2014
(13)
- ► November 2014 (1)
- ► April 2014 (5)
- ► February 2014 (2)
- ► January 2014 (1)
-
►
2013
(32)
- ► December 2013 (6)
- ► November 2013 (1)
- ► September 2013 (5)
- ► August 2013 (20)